I recently had the chance to explore dying shopping centers in out-of-state locations that disprove the trends I observed at Lafayette Square and Washington Square Mall. In many regards, the retail decline at these two locations has advanced much further than the aforementioned two, and yet they remain open due to a resilient flicker of life in both.
The first, Summit Place Mall in Waterford Township, Michigan, benefits from several lengthy descriptions of its history on Deadmalls.com and Labelscar.com. The mall apparently originated in 1962 as a much smaller shopping plaza and then grew in phases over the years, until it began to decline in the late 1990s with the opening of Great Lakes Crossing nearby. I ran into no concerns with security during my visit to Summit Place in July of 2009. The inefficient, serpentine shape suggests the mall enjoyed abundance of space for developers to expand without any need for careful planning: even though it was devoid of crowds at the time of my visit, it still took me over ten minutes to get from one end to the other. In-line stores are over 95% vacant, and yet the winding corridors remain completely open. Mall management has, up to this point, made no effort to consolidate the remaining tenants to a specific location, so the few survivors are scattered. But the majority of the halls look more like this:
The few remaining open in-line stores that I saw contained a barber shop, an insurance agency, and a community theatre with an up-to-date schedule:The only national retailers I saw were Kids Foot Locker and Deb, a discount fashion store targeting young women. What is remarkable about the Summit Place Mall—and what distinguishes it from the two struggling malls in Indianapolis—is that it still had, as of July 2009, three of its five anchor tenants:
Despite the fact that the mall is almost completely empty, these department stores have remained. (Kohl’s apparently only left in the spring of this year.) These are not third-tier or second-tier tenants, either: Macy’s, J.C. Penney, and Sears are all conventional department stores that typically inhabit perfectly desirable malls in middle-class areas. All three have direct access to the exterior parking lot (which is almost always the case), and though I saw few cars on the day of my visit, sales volume at these three stores is ostensibly good enough for them to remain open amidst otherwise catastrophic retail failure. The physical condition of the mall still appears strong. For example, this courtyard, though surrounded by vacant stores, remains competently if cheaply furnished:
It puzzles me how management would be able to continue operating this mall without hemorrhaging money, but a closer scrutiny reveals signs of cost-cutting: lighting is minimal except around active stores, the parking lot is pockmarked with holes and worn cement, and the moribund, 90s-era food court provides the only evidence of a security officer who admitted to me she had nothing to do:But since malls usually earn little or no revenue from anchor stores while depending on the rent from in-line stores, how—and why—is this mall able to stay in business even this long? Unlike Lafayette and Washington Square in Indianapolis, the transformation of Summit Place Mall is inevitable, and apparently NAMCO Capital Group, the mall’s current owners, have asked the remaining in-line tenants to move to stores with exterior entrances, while the non-profits are vacating completely to make way for a major tenant retailer.
Whether or not the proposals of the mall’s general management come into fruition, it appears that these three major department stores are committed to their location. What about the existing socioeconomics of the area would explain why these tenants are not relocating or closing up shop altogether? My guess is that the source of the anomaly is the location within the broader metro area of Detroit. Summit Place Mall rests north of America’s most consistently depressed major city, away from Detroit’s troubles in the wealthy suburbs of Oakland County. While Detroit continuously ranks among the poorest and most crime-ridden of major cities, the suburbs in Oakland County remain consistently prosperous. However, metro Detroit has struggled far worse than the average urban region during this prolonged recession, largely due to the automobile industry’s woes, but also because the city may have been coasting on a particularly misleading real estate bubble, at least partially induced by the artificially inflated wages of jobs at the Big Three auto companies that were surviving as unreasonably leveraged corporate entities for far too long. While Detroit has scarcely enjoyed the prosperity of a peer city such as Chicago, for many years the home values were comparable; the most recent downsizing of the auto industry elicited an unpleasant recalibration of real estate to meet actual demand, and prices plummeted. Oakland County can coast on its comparative wealth, but Summit Place Mall, in affluent Waterford, also abuts the city of Pontiac (the municipal boundary is directly across the street on the east side of Telegraph Road). Pontiac is perhaps the oldest, most industrial, and most economically depressed town in an otherwise stable part of the metro area. Concurrently, Oakland County radiates a misleading prosperity because it is the wealthiest portion of a region that is continuing to implode, shrinking in population as job losses continue unabated.
My suspicion is that the radical, almost violent juxtaposition of wealth and deprivation culminates in a place like Summit Place Mall, where mall traffic and sales volume estimates don’t allow any reasonable conclusions that coincide with national retail study models. Therefore, these department stores perform deceptively well in an area which the retail otherwise shows every indication of being in steep decline. In short, the current life cycle of Summit Place Mall can be explained accordingly: metro Detroit is shrinking in population. If metro Detroit were growing, no doubt an enterprising developer riding the wave of easy credit would have built a new shopping plaza prior to the bust of 2007. This didn’t happen in Detroit because it’s been hurting for while, and these three anchors—Sears, Penney’s, and Macy’s—aren’t leaving Summit Place, which is close to both rich and poor areas, because there are no new locations for them to move to. Thus, they remain. Whether or not they survive another year at the mall—especially if it fails to redevelop in a major way—will largely determine whether my hypothesis is correct.
I have even less of an idea of what to make of L’Enfant Plaza in Washington, DC. An anchorless underground mall at the L’Enfant Plaza stop on the DC Metro subway system, its gold-plated interior suggests a period of prosperity far older than that of Summit Place Mall:My visit may not fairly convey the real nature of this lifeless retail space, because the few visibly occupied shops were closed on the Sunday evening I was passing through. The preponderance of lunch places (the only notable chain is Au Bon Pain) suggests that the shopping place appeals to the lunchtime business crowd in the area only, a space flanked by such major federal government branches as Housing and Urban Development and the Department of Education. The density of office workers traveling through the area each day is formidable. More importantly, L’Enfant Plaza rests atop the convergence of four of the five principal subway lines running through Washington. Considering these factors, shouldn’t the plaza benefit from heavy pedestrian traffic that would transform these storefronts into prime retail space?
Clearly this is not the case, making this another deviation from the rules of good retail: location, location, location. By all estimates the location here should be terrific, but apparently most workers or subway commuters find alternatives when it comes to lunchtime shopping. It could be that the proximity of the Metro station almost makes it too easy to find shinier shopping plazas nearby; any similar shopping center in the Golden Triangle (the heart of DC’s central business district) offers a more eclectic variety in a setting that has been updated to meet contemporary standards of attractive retail. Daytime workers could hop on the subway and be at a much better location for shopping in just a few minutes. Thus, the problem at L’Enfant may derive from poor urban design choices in the 1970s era in which most of it seems to have been constructed: the area around L’Enfant Plaza is no more inviting at the street level than it is underground. The massing of these large institutional structures in southwest DC do not easily accommodate a recreational, white collar shopping/eating experience, since the roads are wide, distances between buildings are great, and a typical streetscape offers a monotony of office windows rather than expansive, retail-oriented fenestration. A facelift may be all it takes to revitalize L’Enfant Plaza as a shopping or lunchtime destination, but I suspect it would achieve little, because the built environment above these underground retail halls fails to harmonize with any of the flurry of activity that occurs below.
Summit Place and L’Enfant Plaza may challenge from the standards of mall decline put forth in earlier blog entries, but they reinforce the notion that retail is highly sensitive to seemingly infinitesimal shifts in people, structures, and the way the two engage with one another. Both spaces are screaming for redevelopment, but unless the person/place dichotomy shows the right level of calibration (or finds the right designer who can work to make them harmonize), they will continue to flounder in retail limbo.
14 thoughts on “Retail failure: defying the patterns.”
Hi, enjoyed your piece. Just wanted to clarify though that Waterford isn’t wealthy by far– it’s a pretty solidly working-class town, a GM bedroom community of sorts. This is the area of Oakland County that doesn’t carry the same affluence as the rest of the county. There are some fine homes along lakefronts (of which there are many) but they tend to be the exception.
Living near Summit Place, I think the factors that killed were the opening of gigantic Great Lakes Crossing in Auburn Hills, the continued downgrading of the area, lack of updates and owners that didn’t know what to do with it, along with bizarre layout.
If they could ever redevelop it into a smaller center, the area does need it, ironically. There’s a large retiree and aging population in Waterford that could be well served.
Thanks for the observation. Interesting that you should refer to Waterford Twp as working class, since the demographics don’t suggest that. But I guess in relation to the affluence that surrounds it, Waterford is comparatively humble, approaching something closer to the income levels of Pontiac than, say, Bloomfield Hills.
The demographic may suggest otherwise but those who live in and around the area know better. Just because it is a hop and skip away from Bloomfield Hills doesn’t mean wealthy.
As an update to Summit Place, the only store left is Sears and they were still fighting the good fight when I visited two weeks ago.
It is too bad about Summit Place. I grew up going there. The more Great Lakes Crossing changes (now called Great Lakes Crossing Outlets – deemed the biggest indoor outlet center in Michigan – yes seems they too were losing money and had a makeover.) Sorry, tangent. The more GLC brings more expensive stores, I long for Summit Place. I still kept going even as they died down and I still go to Sears – best place to shop for dad. Thanks for visiting our area!
As a side note, come back and visit and go into Bloomfield Hills. On the east side is a building they abandoned during construction. Sadly I can’t think of the link for the article on The Oakland Press site.
Thanks for the update. As you might notice from an earlier poster on 31 August, you aren’t the first to note Waterford Townships relatively modest incomes in relations to most of the rest of the county. (Unless you’re the same “anonymous” that posted in 2009, in which case you are the first to note this.) I remember my census research at the time of this blog would still suggest that, while not in keeping with the rest of Oakland County, Waterford Township is still a bit above the national average for household incomes. I guess, though, that when viewed in context of the affluence of most of the county’s other suburbs, Waterford still seems fairly working class.
Thanks for the update on Summit Place–not surprising to me, though I’m sure it’s sad to many of the area’s residents. Have local planners talked about development proposals to replace the mall when (not if) it closes?
June 29, 2013
Oakland County Business Association Inc Michigan
We have met with Summit Place Mall property Manager Sean Rahbar, and Shirley this past week.
Next week we meet with Waterford Planning Director and Assistant Township Supervisor and other officials for a regular event to be held at Summit Place Mall 255 North Telegraph Road, Waterford, Michigan
If approved, this event will be the Biggest ever in Michigan!!!
Tens of thousands of people expected to attend and participate.
I recently found this blog and find it to be very interesting. I did a quick Google search, and apparently the Sears is still there, but everything else is closed.
One article mentioned that bids were made to demolish the mall, but that a buyer was being sought. It makes you wonder how long Sears can hang on.
Thanks for the comments, J.M. It is hard to see how a Sears can hang on, especially considering that Sears is often the struggling element in an otherwise healthy mall. Perhaps Sears is doing the same thing as KMart, where it’s staying alive in an otherwise declining area until it serves as the only real viable department store option for a low-income but expansive trade area. It wouldn’t surprise me if Sears is following Kmart’s footsteps, considering that they are now one and the same company.
UPDATE: Sears closed about a year ago as have any remaining stores on the periphery. There is NOTHING there now. Waterford Township has since condemned the building as there is a great deal of water damage on the interior and the power has been cut. However, as of this writing, there is no definitive plan for redevelopment. The township states that the northern section (built 1990) is still in good structural condition but that the original portion (near former Macy’s) is structurally unsound and will need to be demolished. As a side, Northland Center (one of the first super-regional malls in the US and the first in Metro Detroit) closed in September and has been purchased by the City of Southfield who is soliciting bids for demolition in early-2016. Waterford Township, however, has stated that they have no intention of purchasing Summit Place as the owner is asking $30 million for the property and the township tax rolls assess its value closer to $3 million.
Thanks for the update, Pete. I guess this is logical chain of events, given the condition of the building when I first saw it in 2009. Even the assessor’s estimate of $3M for the site sounds a little steep, but I guess it’s conveniently located.
I was aware of Northland’s closing. I visited the mall about 6 months before the announcement. While pretty inactive, it didn’t seem like it was so close to its complete demise. It leads me to wonder how much of the 1970s Edge City type development in Southfield along the Lodge Freeway (S.R. 10) is in a similar level of vacancy.
Indeed. The famed Minoru Yamasaki (of the original World Trade Center) designed many office structures along M-10 in Southfield and many have seen better days. There is still a demand to build in the outer-most suburban rings and apparently in the downtown/midtown core itself, but the inner-rings like Southfield are being passed over as has-beens. Southfield purchased Northland and has fairly ambitious plans of converting the Hudson’s building into loft apartments and creating a live/work environment. It might just work given its location and easy freeway access elsewhere. Ironically, Victor Gruen, architect of Northland and co-architect of such places like Novi’s Twelve Oaks (along with Kalamazoo architect Richard Prince) had pushed for a residential component to these shopping centers. He wanted a “city within a city” but developers like Hudson’s, Homart (Sears’ mall development division) and A. Alfred Taubman dismissed the idea. This led a frail Gruen to denounce malls in 1978, two years before his death and just as Twelve Oaks was completed, stating “I will not pay alimony to these bastard developments”. He died in 1980. It would be natural that Gruen malls eventually became somewhat residential. Twelve Oaks (his last mall) has survived so far but is showing characteristics that lead to a dying mall. It’s 40 years old and there have been many instances of crime inside and outside the mall. In the past year, there have been more vacancies than during the recession it opened in. I think Gruen was right. I now live in Phoenix and we have the Metrocenter Mall, the largest mall in the world when it opened in 1973. It is now being redeveloped as a multi-purpose residential/commercial/government center connected with an extension of the local commuter rail system, Valley Metro. When people can walk to stores, they will shop them. Gruen and Prince were right. Taubman was wrong. Malls will either adapt or die. Malls were intended to be the modern city center, but without residential development, they have died. As for Summit Place, that place is so incredibly destroyed by the elements and lack of maintenance, it will likely eventually be leveled. The owner will eventually stop paying taxes on it (it’s rumored that the only reason they own it is to write down the depreciation to offset the taxes on their more successful properties) and it will fall to the township who doesn’t have the money to demolish it. Perhaps eventually, some other grant funding or a tax increase will pay to level the entire mall and nature will reclaim the site. I can remember when you couldn’t find a parking space. Today you risk driving into a sinkhole if you try to even enter the parking lot. The interior is covered in black mold and feet of water fill the basements. It’s symbolic of what has happened in this country with overbuilt retail and stagnant wages wiping out the middle class.
Thanks again for the lengthy chronicle, Pete. I’m amazed that Summit Place hasn’t been leveled already, but (obviously) such an undertaking is costly. As recently as five years ago, an economically viable suburb with a dead mall could often still find a developer to purchase and rehabilitate the site, usually by demolishing and putting up a series of big boxes in a “power center” format. Not anymore. Even power centers aren’t getting built, because lenders have no confidence that the developers will be able to secure the tenants they need…since power centers nearly always consciously exclude residences. And, as you noted (and Gruen before you), retail follows rooftops.
I’d be curious about the Novi mall, the Twelve Oaks. I never visited it or Novi when I lived in the Detroit area briefly during 2013-14, and it sounds like it’s probably the second most upscale mall in metro Detroit, behind the Somerset Collection. The fact that it has a Lord & Taylor and Nordstrom should make it far more resilient than most malls, since (at least for now) the malls that have those two high-end department stores usually tend to hold their own. But if one or both of those chains depart, and they’d be the first to go, I’d imagine Twelve Oaks would fit all of the qualifications for a dying mall. All the more ironic since it’s a Taubman property, and, as you noted, the Taubman legacy is one that resisted mixing shopping with other uses.
We have too much retail in this country—WAAAAY too much–and even thriving main streets are feeling the pinch. Meanwhile, downtown malls are dead in all but the alpha cities. My hometown of Indianapolis still has a downtown mall with one marginal department store (Carson Pirie Scott) and a defunct Nordstrom that the manager has successfully split into a variety of office and restaurant uses. While the earning potential at DT Indy’s Circle Centre Mall is better than it was two years ago (when the old Nordstrom was almost completely vacant), most of the recovery has come from trendy small chains opening in the street level…not from any real recovery on the interior among the in-line tenants, which have steadily departed the mall, even as downtown residential population has increased. The mall I just referenced in a very recent blog post (https://dirtamericana.com/2017/07/modern-storefronts-look-great-just-2d/) in downtown Silver Spring, MD is also underperforming…not completely dead but certainly not benefiting from any of the prosperity that the rest of this transit-rich suburb to Washington DC is enjoying.
The best hope for an organic resurgence of malls is a wave of nostalgia for the culture that they embody, but we aren’t there yet. And for us to reach that point, malls will most likely need to become scarce…an endangered species. So we’re not even close. Until that point, the owners will need to repurpose like mad.
Summit Place is 90% demolished. Will soon be 100%. Land bought and will be an office park it sounds like.
12 Oaks is thriving BTW. That mall
Is insanely busy every time ive ever been anywhere near it.
Thanks for this update, JC. It took awhile to come down, didn’t it? It’s amazing that, back when I visited in the summer of 2009, it still had three functional department stores, and the mall was wide open. Apparently they closed the interior just a few weeks later.
You mention that 12 Oaks is thriving, though I noticed that it did lose its Sears, which sounds pretty much like the mall where I grew up, Greenwood Park (still doing well but lost its Sears). Funny that we would still say a mall is thriving despite missing one of its anchor tenants; in the early 2000s, if a mall lost a major department store and didn’t have a replacement lined up, we’d rarely still call it “thriving”. How our standards have changed…