Altamont, Illinois façades: where the upgrade is older than the original.

Whether we measure it in square miles or a single street corner, the average American downtown is enjoying an unprecedented new life. Century-old commercial buildings—underutilized at best, mothballed or abandoned at worst—have comprised the most visible beneficiaries of this revitalization, since investors have reassessed their value as critical signals to the municipality’s historic origins, determining not only that we should spare them from the wrecking ball, but that they’re perfectly capable of serving modern enterprise, after applying a little bit of elbow grease. As a result of this reawakening, virtually every American town center has benefited from the preservation of at least one building over the last twenty years. And while some towns obviously strut their revitalized bling more effectively than others, few places actually look worse than they did in 1987. Quite a few look great.

While few if any towns have discovered a single magic bullet toward a completely revitalized central business district, most seem to recognize at this stage that it’s better to accentuate historic features than to whitewash or completely shroud them. This ethos is almost antithetical to the often half-hearted revitalization efforts of the 1950s, when municipal leadership first noticed that historic business districts were seriously losing ground to automobile oriented shopping malls. At that point, the malls embodied all things sleek and contemporary; town centers suffered from the perception of being outdated and inconvenient. The same unpretentious three-story brick buildings that we celebrate today suffered increasing obsolescence. Property owners, in a desperate attempt to compete with the suburban plazas, demolished the most neglected buildings for expanded parking lots. As for the more salvageable buildings, they sheathed them with space-age inspired synthetic skins that made them look more modern. In some cases, this cladding concealed the upper windows completely: more likely than not, it didn’t matter because the upper floors had ceased securing any tenants. A few years ago, I blogged about a perfect example of this centempo-façade in Thibodaux, Louisiana. Around 1960—when I suspect the owner installed the façade—the repetitive pattern with twin spires mimicked other gestures of the futurist architectural movement—something akin to Oscar Niemeyer’s Brasilia, The Jetsons cartoon, or—a bit closer to home—the average wonderland logo of a suburban shopping mall.



These days, not surprisingly, such facades are an anachronism. They’re not sleek, they don’t enhance the building, and they might even render it less marketable because they impinge upon the usability of those upper floors, filled with windows that could serve a tenant well in this day and age. Today, the most invasive fake façades get stripped to unearth the orderly fenestration underneath. The nostalgic property owners might save some of the quirkiest examples, simply because futurist and Googie vernacular is even rarer now than late 19th century Italianate. Generally speaking, though, the overriding cultural preference for American downtowns is calibrated salvaging of authenticity…a deliberately nebulous phrase that could easily signal a variety of niche taste cultures. All and all, the average owner of a 19th century downtown property would add value to the structure if he or she restores it as closely as possible to its original appearance.


Taking this dichotomy into account—the interplay between old buildings and their ersatz, mid-century modern façades—it came as a bit of a surprise to encounter a completely different treatment a few years ago in the town of Altamont, Illinois (population 2,300).Altamont rustic façadeThe building itself follows the standard urban form one would expect of a town this size. But instead of sheathing it with space-age gestures, the owners decided to do the exact opposite and foist the building’s appearance backward in time…to something like the pioneer prairie.


Yes, it’s just as fake as the frontage in Thibodaux.


And it’s an outlier: other neighboring buildings on the same block retain the more conventional bricked appearance.


Regardless of whether the building housing Clarkson’s Furniture is owner-occupied, the business interests have collectively decided to adapt an appearance more akin to Wyoming or western South Dakota than central Illinois. There’s nothing wrong with this, and it’s likely this façade went up at a completely different time period than the space-age contraptions fronting the building in Thibodaux. But it’s peculiar, because, in an attempt to upgrade this façade in Altamont, the designers opted for an aesthetic that was older and flimsier than the masonry underneath.

Without knowing anything else about Clarkson’s Furniture beyond its website, I can only speculate why the owners either built or choose to locate in a building that offered a vernacular best described as rustic. No doubt due to the relatively high price, furniture elicits high “elasticity of supply design”, if you will (to appropriate an economist term). That is, people often know what they like or dislike and will often reject an entire company’s merchandise if their initial impression of its style doesn’t comport with what they’re seeking. My guess is that Clarkson’s has recognized that a conservative approach is better suited to its clientele, so the latest Danish imports aren’t going to fly in greater Altamont. Bearing that in mind, a futurist façade, albeit 50 years old, is likely still to come across as unorthodox and unappealing to many. Heck, even the original brickwork may be inappropriate; at any rate, it’s less likely to stimulate the senses than unpainted wood. In short, the façade, however visually jarring in central Illinois, may prove the perfect fit for this milieu.

Altamont isn’t thriving, but, when I took these photos (in fall 2012), the five blocks of its commercial district—centered around a triangle where Main and 2nd Street diverge—seemed mostly occupied and well-maintained.DSCF6960DSCF6959My suspicions are that, five years later, the downtown looks better, with carefully swept streets, scrubbed storefronts, decorative plantings, a few more restaurants, maybe even a microbrewery. Even communities the size of Altamont have recognized the intrinsic value in their old commercial districts. State and county economic development agencies routinely offer competitive grants to the towns that can articulate a clearly defined streetscape improvement plan, much of which goes to the restoration of historic façades. These grants, intended to spur further revitalization, often result in a dismantling of the same Kennedy-era plastic sheaths that intended to revitalize the buildings in the first place. Now they’re coming down, as generational preferences shift toward peeling away the veneer to reveal weathered originals. And then there’s Altamont, which perfectly fits the profile of a town that would apply for such a grant. And maybe, ten years ago, futurist references festooned the main street. Now the only outlier is Clarkson’s Furniture, which replaces the Atomic Age with an Appaloosa.

6 thoughts on “Altamont, Illinois façades: where the upgrade is older than the original.

  1. Chris B

    Is it a 70s furniture-store thing? Here is Rich Furniture just north of downtown Indianapolis, located in an old factory/warehouse district. Note the well-kept building, converted to a storage facility, right next door, and the MCM institutional building (with some un-subtle modification of its own) right across the street:,-86.1594625,3a,75y,306.98h,93t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sh2QjlHNdndOtuz3secVwPA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656?hl=en

    1. AmericanDirt Post author

      I think it is one of those “70s” furniture-store things, though I don’t know how the economies for these sort of things might operate in small towns. In larger cities (as in the example you cited, or the old Emrich Furniture building on the near south side) it’s obvious that furniture stores used the cheapest real estate in a relatively central location, so they could capitalize on large floor plates, since they depend so much on exhibition space. But then again, if they came in to being during the 1970s (when downtowns were almost uniformly low value) there may be other rationales as well, such as adjacent long-term storage facilities that you mention. But how that might play out in a town the size of Altamont is another question.

    1. AmericanDirt Post author

      I have! You really have family there? What a coincidence. I’ll confess I was just passing by as I was going from St. Louis to Indianapolis, and I made the Frostian decision to take “the road less traveled”. My familiarity with Altamont does not extend much past the 45 minutes I spent there that one day. So you’d likely know better than I would if Altamont’s little commercial district is doing well.

  2. Mark

    According to Chester Liebs in “Main Street to Miracle Mile,” all the features of this particular building were an attempt to signal authenticity in a way peculiar to the early 1970s. The shingles, fake-mansard roof, the fake board-and -batten siding were found everywhere in those days; there are even a few McDonald’s left with elements of that treatment. It was the age of dawning ecological awareness and architects did their best to capitalize on this with natural materials, and such buildings can be found everywhere in the country, but are so bland as to escape notice most of the time. I lived in a low-income housing development in New Hampshire where scores of buildings were clad like the upper stories of this furniture store. It didn’t age any better than your example.

    1. AmericanDirt Post author

      Thanks for the observations, Mark. It’s always interesting to gauge what the broader public construes as “authentic” at different points in time. Perhaps the faux-rustic aesthetic that emerged in the 1970s helped satiate our demand for nostalgic signals at a time when traditional downtown architecture (like what Clarkson’s Furniture deliberately shrouds) was still a sour point, since downtowns were still fully declining in the 1970s–their typologies overwhelmingly perceived as obsolete. We craved a reference to a bygone era, but we weren’t yet ready for a reference to commercial main streets, since that bygone era still flourished in the memories of most adults in the 1970s.

      I’m not old enough to have great memories of this faux-rustic façade in suburban malls, but I have vague memories of Hickory Farms storefronts that took a barn-door design for their storefronts, which seems pretty ridiculous by today’s standards.

      I’d be very curious to know how much it genuinely reflected an interest in ecological sensitivity–if it really did meet any new standards for conservation or reuse building materials.

      And I’d be even more curious to see one of those McDonald’s that you reference. Thanks for writing.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. You are not required to sign in. Anonymous posting is just fine.