Sweeping the street, cleaning the corner.

In an otherwise flourishing neighborhood in Jersey City, we encounter what might seem like a bit of a surprise.img_4347Boarded-up windows? Looks like blight. But notice that port-a-john in the lower right corner.former dry cleanerSomething’s getting fixed back up. As can be expected among any structure within a mile of this site, demand has only accelerated in recent years for what no doubt has long been an attractive neighborhood, generally referred to as Hamilton Park after the premier green space nearby. It has everything most urbanites would want: well-maintained, sturdy old housing stock, walking distance to PATH stations with direct access to Lower and Midtown Manhattan, a wide variety of both eclectic mom-and-pops and national big-box chains within a square mile, and it virtually fronts the park that gives the neighborhood its name. Here’s a Google Street View from directly across the street from those two photographs.  Unfortunately, the Street View imagery generally fails to capture how vibrant this park is: just one block in size, but densely surrounded by housing and various small shops. But this series of Google Images offers a good enough sense of what’s going on just across the street from these boarded-up buildings.

So it should come as no surprise that an investor has shelled out some money to improve what appears to be a long neglected corner. And it almost seems to be a two-for-one upgrade: the residential building on the left and a low-rise commercial on the right. A quick scan along the exposed side of the commercial building reveals that a renovation is exactly what’s taking place.img_4349Can anyone blame the property owner? But it’s not just the amenities surrounding the property itself; this squat little building has an extensive patio that envelops it. Here’s one angle:img_4352And the deceptively large patio frontage on Erie Street, the smaller and less congested of the two intersecting roads.img_4351In other words, this site offers a magnificent opportunity for a corner restaurant with abundant space for outdoor seating. Given the strength of the local restaurant scene and the comparative weakness of most other retail outlets, I’d wager that, within a few more months, that’s exactly what we’ll see here. In fact, it’s amazing it’s taken this long for such a redevelopment.

But it may not be quite as simple or straightforward as it seems. Step back in time just a few years from some other Google Street View images, and it’s obvious that this storefront hasn’t been vacant so long.  And it wasn’t a restaurant. In fact, it was one of the most frustratingly difficult uses to promote redevelopment: a dry cleaner. When these operations close, they seldom find new owners quickly, unless it’s another dry cleaner. Several months ago, I blogged about what clearly was a long-vacant old dry cleaner in an otherwise solid old neighborhood in Albany, New York. A real eyesore that probably hadn’t served any true use for years, if not decades. This Jersey City counterpart seems to be enjoying a different outcome, and I doubt it will re-emerge as a yet another dry cleaner—not with that extensive interior construction.

So what is it about dry cleaners that make them, in some respects, what is known as a LULU (Locally Unwanted Land Use)? Much like the corner gas station, it’s all about the negative externalities. The chemicals that surge through dry-cleaning operations are potent and largely abiotic. I personally don’t find the smell of freshly dry cleaned clothes unpleasant, but some do—enough that it may seem like a nuisance that keeps neighbors away. Historically, lax regulations have resulted in little oversight in the handling, processing, and disposal of dry cleaning waste, to the point that most long-running operations suffer varying degrees of ground contamination. In fact, most city economic development agencies regard a shuttered dry cleaning store as a sort of mini-brownfield. While standards of contemporary dry cleaners have improved, there’s a reason we still see such high concentrations in the inner city: the land (at least until recently) was cheap, and the white collar workers pass through the areas between their jobs downtown and their homes in the suburbs. It was quick and convenient to pick up dry cleaning along the way, but keep that nasty stuff out of my backyard!

Notice that, in the older Google Street View of this Hamilton Park street corner, the dry cleaner is fully operative but the adjacent home is shuttered. I have no idea the reason for this, but I can only imagine that the proximity to a dry cleaner seriously undermined its appeal. (At any rate, the 2007 Street View suggests the home was occupied.) It’s a testament to the strength of this section of Jersey City that a developer can afford both the pricey real estate and the extensive environmental remediation of this storefront and still expect a good return. Few other cities can make this claim, so the dry cleaners fold, then sit vacant for years—again, much like that corner gas station, until public or nonprofit dollars subsidize the cost of clean-up. That may be the case here in Jersey City as well, but usually the signage at a construction site will have some reference to the agency responsible for mediation, but there’s no evidence of that here at Hamilton Park. In the meantime, I can’t wait to sit and enjoy a nice outdoor meal from whatever culinary incarnation we see here next summer…and enjoy a nice cool glass of water, straight from the tap.

6 thoughts on “Sweeping the street, cleaning the corner.

  1. Rebecca B.

    Until I took environmental law courses, I never knew/thought about environmental impacts of dry cleaners (even though my sister worked for one for years and would have really bad skin issues as a result–should’ve been my first clue those chemicals can be bad news). Hopefully it’ll be something great for the neighborhood.

    Reply
    1. AmericanDirt Post author

      Yeah, it’s surprising what they can do to a small patch of land, and how difficult it is to “turn” that property into something less toxic, even if a neighborhood gentrifies.

      Reply
  2. Chris Barnett

    A Phase I environmental site assessment will always turn up the historical use, so a vacant former drycleaning plant is by definition a brownfield: there is actual or suspected contamination that affects the redevelopment or reuse of the property. There almost always is some contamination, and the probability goes way up with longer tenure, which is why it’s always suspected even if not confirmed yet by environmental testing.

    In your home state, the legal framework exists to make claims against the former drycleaning operation’s insurers, but that is not the case everywhere. The ability to redevelop often hinges on finding a deep pocket to pay for remediation, or on the overwhelming native value of the site that makes remediation only a small part of cost. I suspect the latter is true of the site you highlighted.

    (Disclosure: I’ve been a drycleaning plant owner in the past, have worked on groundwater protection issues for decades, and now work in redevelopment. I have had quite an education on all sides of this issue.)

    Reply
    1. AmericanDirt Post author

      Thanks for the details, Chris. I agree that, in this case, the “overwhelming native value of the site” has much to do with the remediation possibilities. The same couldn’t be said if it were elsewhere in Jersey City–even just a mile to the west would be a completely different story.

      Have regulations improved the standards for dry cleaning operations in recent years? That is, are those that have opened in the last decade still likely to get classified as brownfields when they close? Or have improved standards mitigated the “suspected contamination”?

      Reply
      1. Chris Barnett

        Oh my. You hit a rich vein. 🙂

        Paradoxically, air regulations associated with Clean Air Act amendments in the 90s have done the most to clean up drycleaning operations. The “transfer” process, in which saturated garments are transferred from a “washer” to a “dryer”, is now effectively banned. The process now uses “dry to dry” machines that both wash and dry. The biggest-offending solvent, perchloroethylene, is so expensive that waste is a costly proposition. Solvent vapors, an indication of a “leaky” machine, have been driven to non-detect levels. And not all modern plants use perchloroethylene, as was the case when I was in the industry in the 90s.

        Machines can still spring leaks that spray, or can “ooze” or drip very small amounts of solvent, but typically there is secondary containment around newer machines. So both the incidence and severity of contamination episodes have been knocked way back, but not eliminated. And because the breakdown products of spilled solvent are contaminants at 5 parts per billion in water/soil, it still doesn’t take much to contaminate a site even with modern equipment and “best management practices” in place.

        So while more-recent operations are significantly less likely to be seriously contaminated, I would personally suspect contamination at any former drycleaning plant and plan for remediation if the plant owner had not done so. The question is the order of magnitude: $10K-100K is manageable, but $1 million requires gap filling. It’s no longer a show-stopper if it’s lower-level contamination. So I’d say former drycleaner sites are today where former gas stations were 20-25 years ago…cleanup isn’t impossible or totally unaffordable in most cases.

        The most common pathway of contamination is breathing vapors…which is why apartments in mixed-use areas above the old “transfer” plants were so noxious. Today, the focus is on out-gassing from pockets of contamination below a building, and the typical remediation is a vapor-extraction system under the slab (similar to a radon system, except the vapors are passed over charcoal filters that have to be disposed of as hazardous waste). Those systems can lead to residential re-use…see the new residential development at 1352 N. Capitol in Indianapolis in the former Fame Laundry (and drycleaning) plant.

        Sorry to write a whole blog post in a response. 🙂

        Reply
        1. AmericanDirt Post author

          Thanks for the thorough response, Chris, and sorry for my delay in getting back to you. For some reason notifications aren’t working quite like they should right now. Your description of perchloroethylene may explain why, in the Jersey City example, the adjacent apartment had been closed for such a long time.

          Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. You are not required to sign in. Anonymous posting is just fine.